Do you have something cool to share? Some questions? Let us know:
The conversation began with an examination of the Security Operations and Analytics Platform Architecture (SOAPA) concept, originally conceived by Jon Oltsik. Oltsik drew a parallel between SOAPA's intent and the historical impact of SAP on the ERP space in the 1990s—a movement that transformed business processes and efficiencies, not just technology.
Original Vision vs. Current Reality: Oltsik's original SOAPA vision was a heterogenous, open architecture, with the "Architecture" ('A') being the most critical component. The reality today is a movement toward platformization dominated by single-vendor solutions, which, while logical in retrospect, was not the original intent.
Three Pillars of SOAPA: The core architectural layers envisioned for SOAPA have materialized:
Common Storage Services: Happening through data pipelining and data lake technologies.
Common Analytics Layer: Achieved with different analytics tools accessing centralized data.
Common Workbench: Realized through SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) tools, which are now beginning to intersect with AI.
Consolidation vs. Decoupling Paradox: The security market is experiencing a simultaneous drive toward single-vendor platformization and a movement toward decoupling/best-of-breed tools. This paradox is resolved by a single, critical factor: organizational size and resources.
Small/Midsize Organizations (SMBs): These organizations often lack the resources to build a modern SOC and will opt for single-vendor platforms (similar to the adoption of XDR) or rely on MSSPs (Managed Security Service Providers). For this group, platforms are the practical solution.
Largest Enterprises: These well-resourced organizations, which were the original target for SOAPA, face continuous technology proliferation, verticalization of security, and complex business requirements. For them, a purely centralized, single-vendor model is impossible; they require a heterogeneous, decoupled, SOAPA-like architecture. The transition of their SOC (SOC transformation, not just modernization) demands highly-skilled security architects who are currently in high demand.
2. The Realistic Role of AI and Agents in the SOC
The discussion then pivoted to the impact of Generative AI and Agentic AI on the SOAPA divide, introducing a dose of AI realism to counter market hype.
AI's Tactical vs. Strategic Role:
Large Organizations: AI will primarily be tactical, providing incremental value by automating tedious, repetitive tasks that a Level 1 analyst performs (e.g., alert triage, ticket management, basic threat intelligence reporting). Due to the complexity of their environments, vendors and startups are unlikely to fully "catch up" with fully strategic solutions.
Small Organizations: AI is positioned as strategic, promising basic efficiency gains and threat detection. However, this is where the biggest risk lies.
The Foundational Prerequisite for AI: The most crucial prerequisite for leveraging AI is having a strong, operational foundation. Layering AI on top of broken processes (poor data hygiene, weak communication, lack of detection testing, undefined escalation procedures) will only make the organization more efficient at making mistakes.
AI SOC Hype vs. Reality: Current market claims (e.g., 130 AI SOC startups) are indicative of a lot of "stupid money" and marketing. Today's successful AI in the SOC is basic: a generative AI interface for prompt engineering and automating the low-level tasks that SIM vendors have traditionally neglected.
The MSSP as a Small Business Strategy: For small organizations struggling with foundational security basics (e.g., the IT guy also cutting the lawn), the most strategic move is not direct AI adoption, but hiring a strong MSSP. MSSPs are internally driven by necessity to be highly innovative with AI automation to scale their business and lower costs, meaning their clients benefit from that innovation without bearing the integration and foundational process burden.
Analyst Alignment on Hype: Current research from major analyst firms (Gartner and Forrester) confirms the skepticism, noting that AI and agents are not currently driving SIM purchasing decisions; they are merely considered a "cool add-on." The goal should be to shape expectations to achievable, evidence-based results.
3. The Enduring Challenge of Integration and Standardization
The final major topic addressed the ambiguous nature of "integration" and the need for standardization in the industry.
The Integration Illusion: The current state of security integration is dominated by vendor-centric play or simple API integration. However, a vendor merely claiming "we have APIs" tells practitioners little about the depth, openness, accessibility, or competitive constraints (e.g., VCs precluding API access to portfolio competitors) of that integration.
A Call for Industry Standards: Oltsik reflected on the historical analogy of the Jericho Forum in the early 2000s, where financial services firms drove the concept of de-perimeterization, which eventually evolved into Zero Trust. A similar concerted effort from the largest security customers is needed to force vendors to adopt open standards (akin to or building on OCSF) for seamless integration.
Competing on Features, Not Plumbing: Standardization would be beneficial to all parties, as vendors would be forced to compete on feature functionality and innovation, rather than on closed, proprietary integration "plumbing."
4. Closing Recommendations
Tip for the SOC: Adopt a Threat-Informed Defense strategy (as championed by MITRE). Organizations must understand who is attacking them, how they are doing it, and use that knowledge to strategically develop defenses, detection rules, and testing efficacy. Furthermore, security fundamentals like Vulnerability and Exposure Management remain critically difficult and must be prioritized with business involvement.
Recommended Reading: Fictional works by authors who incorporate strong factual security and technology elements, such as Mark Russinovich (e.g., Rogue Code) and Daniel Suarez (e.g., Daemon and Delta-V), as an accessible and engaging way for newcomers to understand the stakes of the industry.
Timeline of Key Topics
Introduction and the SOAPA Concept
Introduction of Jon Oltsik and the hosts.
The concept of SOAPA (Security Operations and Analytics Platform Architecture) is introduced.
SOAPA's historical context is compared to the business transformation driven by SAP in ERP.
Discussion on the original vision of SOAPA as an open, heterogeneous architecture versus the current market trend toward single-vendor platformization.
The Decoupling vs. Consolidation Paradox
An analysis of the simultaneous market drives toward consolidation (platformization) and decoupling (best-of-breed).
The paradox is resolved based on organizational size and resources.
Platforms and MSSPs are positioned as the logical choice for small and midsize businesses (SMBs).
Heterogeneous, decoupled architectures are deemed necessary for largest, well-resourced enterprises.
The example of healthcare is used to illustrate large-but-under-resourced organizations that may still opt for platforms due to complexity and security struggles.
The Reality of AI in the SOC
The discussion shifts to how Generative AI and Agentic AI affect the SOAPA size divide.
The assessment concludes that AI will be tactical (incremental automation) for large enterprises and strategic (basic efficiency) for smaller ones.
Identification of low-level, repetitive tasks (alert triage, ticket management) as the primary current use cases for AI.
The critical necessity of a strong security foundation before layering on AI to avoid "making mistakes more efficiently."
The recommendation that small organizations rely on innovative MSSPs for AI-driven security rather than trying to implement AI themselves.
Gartner and Forrester's analyst findings on AI not driving SIM purchasing are cited to temper expectations.
Integration, Standards, and Closing Advice
Focus on the ambiguity of "integration" and the current state of vendor-centric or shallow API-based integration.
A call for industry standardization led by major enterprise customers, analogous to the historical push for de-perimeterization by the Jericho Forum.
Oltsik argues that standardization would allow vendors to compete on feature functionality instead of proprietary integration.
Final advice is given: implement a Threat-Informed Defense and prioritize core security fundamentals like Vulnerability and Exposure Management.
Recommended reading consists of technology-aware security fiction.
